Just another WordPress weblog

Apalachee Ridge

Blog Post #10

This week we began working on the code for the Apalachee Ridge Technology Learning Center’s website.  We created a basic template to use, closely mirroring the wireframe that we created.  We received a banner and content from Terrance and began going through it to determine what content belongs on what page.  I have already implemented all the content I have for the page I am in charge of developing.  We basically have all the pages ready to go, with the exception of the Donors page and some of the Home page.  During class lecture on Tuesday, we discussed the usability protocol assignment and discussed our prototype site with Ms. Lustria to find out if we needed any help with our project.  In class lecture on Thursday, we discussed the four basic principles of design (Proximity, Alignment, Repetition and Contrast), the importance of functionality, and how to successfully increase findability.  We also saw some examples of misleading design.  We ended class early because, there is an extra credit assignment which involves going to the Club Day event at Goldstein Library and writing some notes on the posters as well as acknowledging it in this blog, but unfortunately I have a class until 2pm.  This coming weekend we plan on finishing up our prototype, conducting the usability analysis and preparing for the presentation

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #9

This week our classes were cut short due to Veterans Day on Tuesday, November 11.  On Thursday, November 13, we had our final RAQ due, as well as a brief Survey regarding the Midterm Exam.  Ms. Lustria discussed her disappointment with the results of the Midterm and advised that we have two options about making up the score if we are not satisfied with our grade we received by either allowing us to participate in a “re-take” of the exam on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving or having a way to make up 20% of the grade.  We discussed the adjustments of due dates, moving the due date of the Draft Site to the November 20th so that the Web Critique could still be a factor in the creation process.  We also discussed the basics behind the Usability Protocol and began our lecture on “Usability for the Web.”  We went over, what usability is, why it is important, as well as the different studies done based on users reactions during usability.  We also discussed what usability is trying to measure and the difference between testing the site and the user.  This weekend, our team will be getting together to begin the coding for the website.

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Progress Blog #8

This past weekend we were assigned an individual assignment creating the wireframe for our team website for Apalachee Ridge Learning Center.  Our team was instructed to break the site apart into sections based on primary pages.  Mark worked on the “Home” page, Ben worked on the “Media” page, Joe worked on the “Get Involved” page, I worked on the “Digital Media Camp” page, and Hunter worked on the “Contact” page and the template for each page.  On Tuesday October 28, we discussed Search Engine Optimization, which included the importance of optimizing sites, defining metadata and its role, and the different ways to optimize sites for improved findability.  On Thursday October 30, we worked on a review for the exam on Tuesday November 4.  The review was basically a compilation of all the RAQ quizzes we have taken through out the semester.  The items to prepare for next week involve preparing for the test on November 4th, as well as beginning our next assignment which is Usability Protocol.  I believe this will be revolved around the basic usability of our prototype website we are creating for ARLC.  The purpose of usability is to determine the ease and navigational tendencies of the users on the site. 

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #7

This past weekend our overall assignment was to complete the sitemap for Apalachee Ridge Learning Center.  Using Micrcosoft Visio, we created a blueprint style of layout showing the functionality of how our website will work.  We also divided up making corrections to our Client and Audience Analysis to improve the grade we initially recieved for the assignment.  Everyone, as a group, added some primary objectives for the site, explained the technicalities of who and how the site will be maintained, and changed the benchmarking example to relate more to the structure of the Center.  The goal of the changes was to show a better consistency within the report, which was the main issue we needed to address.  Also, the readings and the RAQ for the weekend were extended to Thursday due to Blackboard issues. 

On Tuesday October 21:

We discussed more in depth about Wireframes, going over a few examples, discussing a few things that should be included in wireframes, the different types of wireframes (i.e. Annoted, Low-Fidelity, and High-Fidelity), as well as some guidlines and tools.  We also took some group work time to work on making corrections on the Client and Audience Analysis.

On Thursday October 23:

We discussed the pros and cons of website navigation.  We went through some example websites trying to spot different problamatic issues with signs and websites, etc.  We spent the remainder of class discussing the wireframe assignment regarding who is gonna do which page. 

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #6

This past weekend our group collaborated together and began work on creating our content inventory.  This exercise was an effort to begin preparing us for our card sorting exercise, which also prepares us to successfully create our site map, which will be the next assignment due next week.  This week in class, on Tuesday October, 14, we had a lecture on labeling systems and the different types of labels that are important in Information Architecture (i.e. Contextual Links, Headings, Index Terms, etc).  There was also a discussion on the different cultural styles of labeling; examples included British and Asian websites.  We also went over different tips in creating successful labels.  At the end of class we got into our groups and touched up our Content Inventory lists in final preparation for the card sorting exercise.  Then on Thursday October, 16, we discussed the creation of sitemaps.  Topics included, how they are made, why and who they are made to target. There was also discussion about the difference between sitemaps and wireframes.  Wireframes are just a mock-up of what elements are going to be included in each page, a sitemap is an overview of how the site will be structured.  We also began the card sorting exercise, which involved looking at another teams inventory cards and classifying them into different categories. 

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #5

This week we had an individual Personas and Scenarios assignment to work on for Tuesday.  I did my P&S on Dylan, a 16 year old high school student who uses the center regularly for school research, surfing the internet, making music and just a place to hang out after school.  Up next our team has to work on putting together our sitemap of the layout for the new site we are putting together.

This week in class:

Tuesday Oct. 7:  We had a lecture on organizing information.  We discussed two of the main types of information architecture, as well as common organizational schemes and structures.  There was also discussion on how someone would search for information, as well as how to implement it into the website logically.  We also discussed why organization is important abd different ways to organize things using different schemes (alphabetical, chronological, geographical, etc.)

Thursday Oct. 9:  We had a guest speaker from PriceWaterhouseCoopers.  The discussion was mainly about the relationship between their company and information architecture.  We talked about the different types of Architecture within their websites (redundancy, usability, etc).  Ms. Lustria had to move the due dates and lectures because she had lost her voice.  Our inclass activity to prepare our teams for a card sorting activity was to begin work on our content inventory for Apalachee Ridge.

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #4

This week our group completed work on the Client and Audience Analysis for Apalachee Ridge Technology Learning Center.  For the most part, we gathered information based on who the primary and secondary audience is.  We also conducted a client interview with Terrance McNeil.  Hunter and I completed the final editing of the document. Ben, Joe and Mark worked on the paper’s formatting.  We will all be signing the printed version of the document on Tuesday.

This week in class:

Tuesday (Sept 30), we discussed how to find differences in Information Architecture by working through a “Where’s Waldo” type of activity.  Charts and maps related to Information Architecture was also discussed during the lecture.

Thursday (Oct 2), we discussed the Personas and Scenarios assignment which is due on Oct 9.  Some of the key points we also discussed was brainstorming ideas and the idea of how the assignment should be done.  Class was shortened to allow us time to ask questions and work on completing the Client and Audience Analysis.

Based on the team work this week, I learned a variety of useful techniques in gathering information and conducting necessary research about the client and audience of the intended website for Apalachee Ridge Technology Learning Center. 

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #3

This week our group completed and finalized the Project Plan and Schedule.  Hunter was supposed to have interviewed Terrance McNeil on Wednesday, however after finding out that we were still doing assignments building up to the Client and Audience Analysis we may need to meet back up and re-do the questionaire.  One thing I’m not sure about is if the Client and Audience Analysis that Hunter through together meets the requirements of 8-12 pages.  We may be meeting this weekend to go over it and finish putting it together, as well as setting up another interview with Mr. McNeil.  I missed class on Thursday and have yet to hear back from anyone in the group regarding this.

In class on Tuesday (Sept.23), we had a lecture about Personas and Scenarios including doing a worksheet that was due at the end of class on Thursday (Sept. 25).  The worksheet consisted of  creating lifelike personas of each group of our intended audience.  We determined who would create which persona as well as coming up with names of each and tasks that each persona may be using the website for.

On Thursday (Sept. 25) there was no lecture.  We had an In Class Activity completing a Heuristic Evaluation of Apalachee Ridge’s current website and similar websites.  The evaluation was based on the navigational structure and usibility of the current site, as well as a screen shot and quick questionaire of a similar website from another organization.  The benchmarked site was intended to show similarities in what we would like the new site to resemble (i.e. ideas from that site to improve the current Apalachee site).  

Sphere: Related Content

Personal Blog Post #2

This week our group got together and began working on the Project Plan and Client & Audience Analysis.  We divided up different sections of the assignment as follows:

  • I ran to Apalachee Ridge and had Terrance sign the Service Learning Contract, drew up the timeline for the schedule, and revised some of the content in the Plan

  • Ben input much of the content for the plan during our brainstorming session

  • Hunter offered to begin work on the Client & Audience Analysis, he has background in research and interviewing

  • Joe and Mark are working on the Work Breakdown Structure and the Communication Plan

We are currently wrapping up work on the Project Plan for submission. 

So far, we have read about what personas and scenerios are.  From what I understand, personas define the characteristics of the possible users.  Scenerios are fictional situations in which a user or persona may be involved with when navigating through the website. 

Based on what I have learned in class this week, in relation to our group project, we have learned about creating scenerios and personas to accurately create a sucessful website for the client we are working with.  We have also picked up some ideas in learning about the users that will be using the site and what they would need for moderate navigation.  This includes interviewing tactics, surveys and usability concepts.  

Sphere: Related Content

Final Apalachee Ridge Comments

  1. Name of team members: Alejandro Rosete
  2. Document versions and date: I had posted two updates on my podpress page
  3. Executive Summary
    1. The project status has not changed much at all from the last update.  I’m still working on my own trying to figure out how to troubleshoot Windows Server 2003 with no help from Melissa Raulston or he help desk, being told to “Buy a Book.”  Which I did and has no troubleshooting section for applying Group Policy to a client computer.  I am still putting almost all my free time into researching this and have been so burnt out that I’m not sure I even want to continue doing it, however, I have failure and I am not a quitter so I plan on eventually getting it the way Terrance wants.
    2. I highly recommend that the school not give up on this school project, after speaking with the student who made provided the biggest concern about the way things were run at the center she told me she wasn’t even doing the program for the learning aspect of the project and that she was only there to babysit the kids who never showed, mostly due to the summer and kids not being in school.  From what I gathered she was just mad that there were no kids to babysit.  There are still plenty of IT related projects that need to be done at that program.  There needs to be someone who knows their way around a server to adjust the downloading settings for the student profiles, install a central storage hard drive so that all the files saved by the students are saved into one location, apply group policy settings so that student homepages are all the same and complete routine maintenance on the server.  Melissa gave the center a network laser printer which needs a new part put into the paper feeder and LSS has ignored my emails about that, as well as Melissa.  Now I understand that Melissa is a busy woman, but until she decided to turn her back on ARLC she used to return my emails with useful information almost immediately.  Since that day I have not received one response.  The Center still needs a website, which I was going to do but was convinced by Melissa not to even waste my time.  The fall semester starts soon and will be most likely gaining a large number of students there who will need the support of an IT staff.
    3. The project met most of its goals up until the point that the 3 team members were pulled out of the project.  As stated in the initial instructions of the assignment, the furniture was moved around to be better organized and everything was completed, including straightening up the center in preparation of the center.  The failure was the city taking too long to provide Terrance with a budget to run the camp successfully, which is pretty much the reason the girls were pulled.  There are still server issues that need to be addressed as well as the website, and beginning in the Fall semester there will need to be help in taking care of these children.
    4. I have learned a great deal about Server 2003 from this project.  I have also learned that not everyone was there to learn IT stuff which became obvious when the complaining about the children began.

 

 

Communication Plan

Communication Plan

Date: July 27, 2008

Project Name:  Apalachee Ridge Learning Center

________________________________________________________________________

Introduction

This document provides a summary of the communication plan for the Apalachee Ridge Digital Media and Technology Learning Center.  It includes a list of the main audiences for this project, the goals for each of those audiences, the method(s) used to reach of the audiences and the timing of the communications.  In many cases these communication activities will be included and described further in the project’s work breakdown structure.
________________________________________________________________________

Audiences

Sponsor (or other audience):

The overall supervisor/sponsor of the learning center is Terrance McNeil.  Mr. McNeil has a background in music production and education.   

            Goals

Server maintenance is a must.  Mr. McNeil would like the student profiles to all have the same homepages applied through the server.  He would also like to prevent student profiles from downloading content to the computer they are using.  A website is a request, however, due to internal complications that may never launch so it has been put on hold.  He also would like a central storage point where all the files saved under student profiles would also be saved in one location on the server.  Any other ideas as that may assist in improving or implementing technology into the learning center must be communicated with Mr. McNeil for approval prior to working on anything.

            Method

Brainstorming ideas will be discussed with Mr. McNeil prior to the center opening every day, as well as during staff meetings in the board room at the end of each day.  Hiring help is also possibly going to be a requirement for this Fall.

Project Team:

The project team consisted of Kristen Norena, Meka Adderly and Janeca Jackson.  They were going to be assisting in the babysitting aspect of the camp as well as implementing technology education into the students education but has since been pulled from the project.

            Goals

Any ideas that the project team may have which would improve the aspect of the learning center must be communicated with Mr. McNeil for approval.  Some of the major goals are server maintenance, being the only person there with absolutely no knowledge of a server makes it hard to maintain, even after I bought books to teach myself.  Website is necessary, but again, with no guarantee of a launch there was no reason to begin construction.

            Method

Brainstorming ideas will be discussed with Mr. McNeil prior to the center opening every day, as well as during staff meetings in the board room at the end of each day.
_______________________________________________________________________

Comments

The computers have been updated and cleaned, as well as separated between working and non-working.  The initial computer lab still needs its own separate printer.  Server maintenance is also still a major need.  Website creation will begin next semester if FSU continues to provide support to this project.  In order for this project to be successful there will need to be a team sent to the center next semester, preferably on willing to learn IT related skills and not child education skills. 

Sphere: Related Content